Effect of Saffron Versus Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRIs) in Treatment of Depression and Anxiety: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

  • Published In: Nutrition Reviews, 2025, v. 83, n. 3. P. e751 1 of 3

  • Database: Academic Search Ultimate 2 of 3

  • Authored By: Shafiee, Arman; Jafarabady, Kyana; Seighali, Niloofar; Mohammadi, Ida; Abadi, Shahryar Rajai Firouz; Abhari, Faeze Soltani; Bakhtiyari, Mahmood 3 of 3

Abstract

Context Saffron, a natural remedy with potential antidepressant and anxiolytic properties, has gained attention as a potential therapeutic option. Objective This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of saffron versus selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) in treating depression and anxiety. Data Source Electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane database, were searched from inception to April 31, 2023. Data Extraction Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing saffron intervention with SSRIs in adults with depression or anxiety were included. Data Analysis Random-effects meta-analysis using standardized mean differences (SMDs) and risk ratio (RRs) with their 95% CIs calculated continuous and binary outcomes, respectively. Meta-analysis of 8 studies assessing depression outcomes revealed a nonsignificant difference between saffron and SSRIs in reducing depressive symptoms (SMD = 0.10l 95% CI: –0.09 to 0.29). Four studies reporting anxiety outcomes showed a nonsignificant difference between saffron and SSRIs in reducing anxiety symptoms (SMD = 0.04; 95% CI: –0.22 to 0.29). With regard to safety, participants receiving saffron had fewer adverse events than the SSRI group (risk difference: –0.06; 95% CI: –0.09, –0.04; I2: 0%). Conclusion Saffron could be a potential SSRI alternative to reduce depressive and anxiety symptoms with fewer adverse events. Further research with larger sample sizes and in diverse populations is warranted to validate these findings and explore potential moderators of treatment response. Systematic Review Registration PROSPERO registration no. CRD42023443236. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Additional Information

  • Source:Nutrition Reviews. 2025/03, Vol. 83, Issue 3, pe751
  • Document Type:Article
  • Subject Area:Complementary and Alternative Medicine
  • Publication Date:2025
  • ISSN:0029-6643
  • DOI:10.1093/nutrit/nuae076
  • Accession Number:183076492
  • Copyright Statement:Copyright of Nutrition Reviews is the property of Oxford University Press / USA and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.