Epiphenomenal suasion: Jehovah's Witnesses and the politics of preaching against the state.

  • Published In: Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 2024, v. 30. P. 25 1 of 3

  • Database: Academic Search Ultimate 2 of 3

  • Authored By: Cardoza, Danny 3 of 3

Abstract

The individual is the conventional way religious change is figured when considering 'conversion'. This essay argues this is rooted in the soteriological focus of Christian evangelism and shifts what are typically taken to be the objects of change to view them as agents of change. As an example of this, the essay compares two ethnographic examples of Jehovah's Witnesses' evangelism: the ways that Witnesses preach with mobile literature carts; and the way three Witnesses 'preached' at an academic conference in Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan. In order to make sense of these examples, it is necessary to unpack the theopolitical context underlying the common suasive strategy, and doing so is revealing in both instances of different objects and agents of evangelism, allowing for a comparison that explores how causality and agency are distributed in Witness preaching work. This leads to a consideration of the ways Witnesses' public evangelism subtly preaches against the state as a process of 'vindicating the name of God'. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Additional Information

  • Source:Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute. 2024/04, Vol. 30, p25
  • Document Type:Article
  • Subject Area:History
  • Publication Date:2024
  • ISSN:1359-0987
  • DOI:10.1111/1467-9655.14106
  • Accession Number:176812781
  • Copyright Statement:Copyright of Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.